1980 Audi 200 vs. 1946 Maserati 6C
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 462 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Because 1946 Maserati 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1946 Maserati 6C | |
Make | Audi | Maserati |
Model | 200 | 6C |
Year Released | 1980 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 804 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |