1980 Audi 200 vs. 1948 Jaguar Mark IV
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 79 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Because 1948 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1948 Jaguar Mark IV | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 200 | Mark IV |
Year Released | 1980 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3060 mm |