1980 Audi 200 vs. 1956 Porsche 356
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 536 kg more than 1956 Porsche 356.
Because 1956 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 200 | 1956 Porsche 356 | |
| Make | Audi | Porsche |
| Model | 200 | 356 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 52 L |
