1980 Audi 200 vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 86 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 200 | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
| Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
| Model | 200 | Sprite |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 27 L |
