1980 Audi 200 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 96 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | 200 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |