1980 Audi 200 vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Audi | Matra-Simca |
Model | 200 | Murena |
Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2440 mm |