1980 Audi 200 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1983 Toyota Celica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 86 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 200 | Celica |
Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |