1980 Audi 200 vs. 1988 Dodge Colt
To start off, 1988 Dodge Colt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 71 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 200 | 1988 Dodge Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | 200 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
