1980 Audi 200 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | Midge |
Year Released | 1980 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |