1980 Audi 200 vs. 1996 Holden Nova
To start off, 1996 Holden Nova is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1996 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 176 kg more than 1996 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1996 Holden Nova | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 200 | Nova |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |