1980 Audi 200 vs. 1998 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1998 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 171 kg more than 1998 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1998 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 200 | Celica |
Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |