1980 Audi 200 vs. 1999 Chrysler Java
To start off, 1999 Chrysler Java is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1999 Chrysler Java. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chrysler Java. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Java weights approximately 334 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chrysler Java. (130 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chrysler Java.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1999 Chrysler Java | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | 200 | Java |
Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |