1980 Audi 200 vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 1999 Nissan Z is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1980 Audi 200. (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 200.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan Z. (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1999 Nissan Z | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Z |
Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |