1980 Audi 200 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 104 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Because 2000 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Audi | Tata |
Model | 200 | E |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |