1980 Audi 200 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1980 Audi 200. (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 354 kg more than 1980 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 200 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 83.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |
