1980 Audi 200 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (158 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 219 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | 200 | ZT |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |