1980 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1980 Audi 200. (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1008 kg more than 1980 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 200. (265 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Armada |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |