1980 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1980 Audi 200. (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 359 kg more than 1980 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 200 | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | 200 | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 88.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |
