1980 Audi 200 vs. 2005 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2005 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 582 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Because 2005 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu D-MAX (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 200. (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 Isuzu D-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 2005 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | 200 | D-MAX |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3060 mm |