1980 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 34 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 200 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |