1980 Audi 200 vs. 2011 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. (155 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 165 kg more than 1980 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 200 (265 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 2011 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 200 | HHR |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2629 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 61 L |