1980 Audi 4000 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (195 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 4000 | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 4000 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 207 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
