1980 Audi 4000 vs. 2008 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 SsangYong Rexton (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Rexton (345 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2008 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 4000 | 2008 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | 4000 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 345 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
