1980 Audi 4000 vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 411 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 4000 | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 4000 | F-350 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3967 mm |