1980 Audi 80 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1980 Audi 80 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 80 (59 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 20 kg more than 1980 Audi 80.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 80 | FX |
Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |