1980 Audi 80 vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1980 Audi 80 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Jeep CJ (62 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 230 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | 80 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3151 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1350 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |
