1980 Audi 80 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1980 Audi 80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | Sixty |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 208 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 2120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 79 L |