1980 Audi 80 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1980 Audi 80 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 80 (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 80 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 80 (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | 80 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 25 L |
