1980 Audi 80 vs. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1980 Audi 80 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1980 Audi 80.
Because 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1980 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1980 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 80 | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
