1980 Audi 80 vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 1986 Rover 825 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rover 825 weights approximately 566 kg more than 1980 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | 80 | 825 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |