1980 Audi 80 vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 1994 Plymouth Colt is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Plymouth Colt (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 245 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (104 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1994 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Plymouth |
| Model | 80 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
