1980 Audi 80 vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 110 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Puma (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | Puma |
Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |