1980 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Eagle Talon
To start off, 2002 Eagle Talon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Talon (209 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Talon weights approximately 470 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Eagle Talon (290 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Eagle Talon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 2002 Eagle Talon | |
Make | Audi | Eagle |
Model | 80 | Talon |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 209 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |