1980 Audi 80 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 958 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (104 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | 80 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |
