1980 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 526 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (101 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | 6 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |