1980 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 541 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (104 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | 80 | Sable |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |