1980 Audi 80 vs. 2008 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 873 kg more than 1980 Audi 80.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJR (505 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (104 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 2008 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 80 | XJR |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 505 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 81 L |