1980 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 80 (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 80 weights approximately 372 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 80 (104 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 80 | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Audi | Tata |
Model | 80 | Nano |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 37 L |