1980 Audi 80 vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 80. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Audi | Citroen |
| Model | 80 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
