1980 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1980 Audi 80.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 80 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 80 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
