1980 Audi Quattro vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1980 Audi Quattro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi Quattro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Quattro (200 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Quattro should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi Quattro weights approximately 870 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Audi Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi Quattro | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Audi | Simca |
| Model | Quattro | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2143 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2250 mm |
