1980 Audi Sport vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1980 Audi Sport is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,133 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Sport (300 HP) has 260 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 210 kg more than 1980 Audi Sport.
Because 1980 Audi Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi Sport | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Sport | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2133 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 75 L |
