1980 Audi Sport vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Audi Sport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,133 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Sport (300 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1980 Audi Sport.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi Sport (330 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Audi Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi Sport | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Audi | Triumph |
| Model | Sport | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2133 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |
