1980 Audi Sport vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1983 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi Sport would be higher. At 2,133 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Sport (300 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1980 Audi Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi Sport (330 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1980 Audi Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi Sport | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Sport | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2133 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |