1980 Audi Sport vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi Sport would be higher. At 2,133 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Sport (300 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 266 kg more than 1980 Audi Sport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi Sport (330 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (181 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Audi Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi Sport | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | Sport | Tracker |
Year Released | 1980 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2133 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2210 mm |