1980 Audi Sport vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi Sport would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Sport (300 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 208 kg more than 1980 Audi Sport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi Sport (330 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm). This means 1980 Audi Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi Sport | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Sport | Ranger |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2133 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 323 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 74 L |