1980 Audi Sport vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi Sport would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi Sport (300 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi Sport should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi Sport (330 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 1980 Audi Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi Sport | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | Sport | Captiva |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2133 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |