1980 Audi UR vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1980 Audi UR is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi UR weights approximately 405 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Taunus |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 58.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |