1980 Audi UR vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1980 Audi UR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1980 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 760 kg more than 1980 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi UR | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | Calais |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |
