1980 Audi UR vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1980 Audi UR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 750 kg more than 1980 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi UR | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
